Medical Myths: Does Food Cause Ulcers?

Content provided by the Faculty of the Harvard Medical School

Medical Myths: Does Food Cause Ulcers?

There you are, having your pepperoni pizza when that feeling comes over you: pressure, burning, fullness in your upper abdomen and a bitter taste in the back of your throat. To add insult to injury, your kid brother reminds you about your ulcer and how you had better start eating better.. You wonder how you could ever get along with the diet recommended to you then when the ulcer was first detected years ago.

This scene is repeated over and over in great restaurants and dining rooms every day. And along with it, the myth about food causing ulcers is perpetuated.

The answer is No

It is now well established that foods have little or nothing to do with ulcer development. Food's true effect on ulcers is dwarfed by other, more important factors. But the word has not gotten out: many people cling to the now disproven notion that if you have had an ulcer, you must be careful about what you eat for fear of making the ulcer worse or causing a new one.

Peptic ulcer disease refers to ulcers involving the lower part of the stomach and upper intestine (the duodenum) into which the stomach empties. Theories about cause have evolved over time, but for many years it was thought that the type of food you ate mattered: ones that stimulate acid secretion, are acidic themselves, or spicy foods that burn the mouth were all assumed to be important in causing or aggravating ulcers. However, in recent years, it has become clear that the vast majority of peptic ulcers have one of two causes:

• a bacterial infection (Helicobacter pylori), or

• non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen or aspirin).

A small percentage of ulcers are caused by other problems (such as excessive acid production or tumors) but foods, including spicy ones, coffee, and even alcohol play a minor or negligible role. In addition, frequent small meals with a bland diet and milk, time-honored recommendations for the ulcer patient may actually lead to increased acid production. Milk may lead to reduced symptoms but should not be considered effective ulcer treatment. Smoking, on the other hand, is clearly associated with worse ulcer disease.

Why the myth persists

The myth about the role of foods in ulcer disease is difficult to debunk for several reasons:

• the understanding about the cause of ulcers is relatively recent,

• publicity about this "breakthrough" has been relatively minor outside of medical circles,

• it seems intuitive that spicy foods that must be bad for the stomach, and

• there is widespread confusion between the symptoms of "heartburn" and those of ulcer disease.

Reflux versus ulcers

What is commonly called heartburn is actually gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and is much more common than ulcer disease. In GERD, acid from the stomach washes back (refluxes) into the lower part of the stomach and causes burning, pressure, belching and a bitter taste; it is often worse after eating, especially if you lie down. Spicy foods may certainly provoke symptoms of GERD and if frequent, damage to the lower esophagus may lead to narrowing, difficulty swallowing or other complications. Ulcer disease, on the other hand, usually causes upper abdominal pain that is relieved by eating and worse between meals, bleeding (causing black, tarry stools) or no symptoms at all. Effective treatments are available for both problems.

So, if you have GERD, by all means, avoid those foods that you have noticed worsen your symptoms and if symptoms are frequent, talk to your doctor about treatment options. If you have ulcer disease, avoid NSAIDs, find out (with your doctor's help) if you have H.Pylori infection and if you do, take the antibiotics that effectively eradicate the bacteria. And if your kid brother keeps pestering you about your diet, give him that lecture about his smoking.

Last updated:	September 05, 2008