What Age for Mammograms?


New Mammogram Guidelines Spark Controversy

woman getting mammogram
jupiterimages

By Mary Beth Sammons

Everything women have been told about breast cancer screening seems to have been turned upside down in the last 24 hours following controversial new guidelines that say women ages 40 to 49 should not get annual screenings.

An influential group's new recommendations about mammograms for younger women sparked a firestorm of controversy since Monday that has left women without clear guidance about how best to protect their health. From Twitter to the TODAY Show, women, their loved ones, patient advocacy groups and healthcare providers have been engaged in a furious debate that begs the question: “What should we do now?”

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a government-sponsored taskforce of leading scientists, whose work is closely followed by doctors and insurance companies, is now advising that healthy women in their 40s may not need routine breast screenings. The report states that the benefits of screening before age 50 do not outweigh the risks.

What's more, the panel said in materials published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, that breast self-exams do no good, and women shouldn't be taught to do them. The new guidelines are for the general population, not those at high risk of breast cancer because of family history or gene mutations. The study called for women ages 50 to 74 to receive breast cancer screening every two years.

“I was absolutely stunned to hear this,” says Leah Siegel, 43, a mother of three children ages one to five from Dallas, who was diagnosed with Stage Four breast cancer last year, and given a 50-50 prognosis to live two to four years. “Most of the women in my support group discovered they had breast cancer when they found a lump or through a mammogram. They are saying the numbers aren’t high enough to justify this testing. Well, they are high enough for me.”

The new guidelines are gaining strong resistance from medical groups, including the American Cancer Society, which for more than a decade has urged all women to begin annual mammography at age 40. The ACS also recommends magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, every year for women who are at high risk of having breast cancer. The National Cancer Institute recommends a mammogram every one or two years for women starting at age 40. The American Medical Association endorses annual screening for women beginning at age 40.

“These unfounded USPSTF recommendations ignore the valid scientific data and place a great many women at risk of dying unnecessarily from a disease that we have made significant headway against over the past 20 years,” says Carol H. Lee, MD and chair of the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Commission. Mammography is not a perfect test, but it has unquestionably been shown to save lives -- including in women aged 40-49.”

With breast cancer the second leading cause of death for women in the U.S., the controversial new advice is “very confusing,” says Michael Ziener , Executive Director Chicagoland Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure. Ziener, whose mother died of breast cancer, added: “The Komen organization is not advocating any changes in its current recommendations, which say that, women over age 40 with average health risks get annual mammograms as well as those at higher health risks. We’re also stressing that women with high risk factors consult with their primary physicians to help make their decisions. Cancer is personal.”

On the TODAY Show, chief medical editor Nancy Snyderman MD, called the study a “seismic shift,” in breast cancer screening guidelines. “Seismic shifts don’t come often in this country, but this is one of those times. Good science takes what we think we do know and turns it on its head. This is a balance of harms and benefits, with the benefits of screening found not to outweigh the risks. Many women have false positives and unnecessary biopsies, and also being exposed to radiation.”
Read and Post Comments | More on AOL Health
Recent Comments
1-8 of 22 Next 22 comments
tarramitchell79
tarramitchell79 2010-02-07 17:44:25 Report This!

Get FAST hemorrhoid relief naturally with all natural Hem-eez. I got rid of my hemorrhoids in three days using Hem-eez. It also has a 90 day money back guarantee. Get fast relief at hem-eez.com

wegfisherman
wegfisherman 2010-01-24 13:02:59 Report This!

i wish there was another test besides mammogram cause it hurts me since i have had breast cancer and have scar tissue built-up. i know they do in big cities. and why wont medicare pay for an ultrasound to be done first? i dread it every year and i shoulden't have too.

gianagrl
gianagrl 2009-12-28 19:15:39 Report This!

The best insurance against any disease is prevention, women need to educate and discipline themselves to be fit and healthy, that is the ultimate way of avoiding such life debilitating disease.

mmartinid
mmartinid 2009-12-21 14:19:04 Report This!

It is obvious what is going on here in America. Obama is forcing all Americans to purchase health insurance for children (sounds good). But, has made deals under the table with the insurance agencies, to save the insurance agencies money. Don't you see, if it is illegal to not have insurance; we will ALL be stuck with what the government i.e. insurance companies want to provide for us. If you are outraged by the mammograms, have you concidered what will be next? This is just the beginning. Yes, many women will continue to get their mammograms at ages earlier than 50, they will pay out of their own pocket, while still paying their regular premiums, some having to decide between that and buying groceries, many many women will wait until 50, if they make it there. While, as many have commented, we (tax payers) continue to fund wars. We should all share the burden of the war, insurance companies included! Obama is concerned for children under 50, reach 50 & your expendible.

melissa
melissa 2009-12-03 22:33:26 Report This!

I don't believe that woman should wait to start having mammograms till the age of 50. Even women in very good health, in my opinion, should be safe not sorry. My mom had developed breast cancer shortly after becoming pregnant withh my younger sister, now 12, and she was 46 at the time. If those guidelines were in that time my mom would never have been diagonosed with the disease and may not be here today. She may have a family history of the disease and used to smoke and drink but still. And come on, there's probably a higher percentage of unhealthy people compared to the healthy people who do not drink/smoke or have some sort of family history. In my opinion this new guideline sounds like a real cheap way to save money becuase how many people are going to admit that they aren't healthy?Due to that, in my opinion, I have a feeling there will be a higher rate of breast cancers deaths from this guideline.

silkscreen001
silkscreen001 2009-12-02 05:22:09 Report This!

I will bet you $10 that the people on that task force have breast exams, or their wives and mothers and sisters and aunts get them every year. After 50 we are expendable. We will be thrown away like so much garbage. This health reform is not a reform it is a death notice to all over 50. This will cost us 2 trillion a year to start and illegal aliens are still going to be covered. I don't know about you all but that pisses me off.

silkscreen001
silkscreen001 2009-12-02 05:14:47 Report This!

My mother, maternal grandmother and maternal aunt died from breast cancer. They were all fairly young when they found lumps in their breasts. I have been having mammagrams since I was 22, and I am now 66. I will continue to have them every year I don't care what Obama or anyone else says. Even if I have to pay the full amount my self I will do it. So far I have been very lucky as has my daughter who is now 45. I have 5 granddaughters also and you can bet your life they will be getting mammagrams when the time comes.The men in our family has promised everyone of the ladies that they will see to it . God bless our good men.

younglittlefilly
younglittlefilly 2009-11-28 21:22:50 Report This!

I am now 51. I was diagnozed with breast cancer at the age of 38. I found the lump myself through self a self breast exam. The mammgram followed. The biopsy, lumpectomy, and mestectomy,chemo, and all my lympnoids were removed. If I hadn't been taught or didn't know about self beast exams, and knowing to go in for a mammogram. I know I would probably be dead. There was no history in my family of breast cancer. I believe it should go back to 35 yrs old. The panal of So called Scientist or Drs who decided this probably has never been through it themselves. Just want to look good in front of the politicians, and save the government and insurance company's some money. We have been getting cost of living raises every year, but then our insurance goes up higher, and they keep wanting to cut back on what they pay. I can live comptrable now for paying Drs, and hospitals bills that the insurance should pay. It is all a ploy for them to save money while people die.

1-8 of 22 Next 22 comments
Add your own Comments
1000 Characters Maximum

More About Breast Cancer

Find out the risk factors, symptoms and treatments for breast cancer as well as myths you shouldn't believe.

Best of the Web >>>